Food for thought: BTC Inactivity Reaches ATH

The percentage of the Bitcoin supply that has been inactive for more than two years has just hit a new all-time high of 51.385%. Additionally, the percentage of Bitcoin supply that has been inactive for more than three years has also reached a new all-time high of 39.261%. The previous record for the latter was observed on March 4, 2023, at 39.260%.

The fact that the percentage of Bitcoin supply that has been inactive for more than two years has hit an all-time high of 51.385% could potentially have both positive and negative implications for the cryptocurrency market.

On the positive side, this could indicate that more and more investors are holding onto their Bitcoin for the long term, believing in the future potential of the asset. It could also suggest that people are becoming more confident in Bitcoin's stability as a store of value, as they feel comfortable holding onto it for extended periods.

However, on the negative side, a high percentage of inactive Bitcoin supply could potentially lead to a decrease in liquidity, which could result in increased volatility and price instability in the short term. Moreover, it could mean that a significant portion of the Bitcoin supply is being held by whales, who may be able to manipulate the market by buying or selling large quantities of Bitcoin.

Similarly, the new all-time high of 39.261% for Bitcoin supply inactive for more than three years may also have both positive and negative implications. On the positive side, it could mean that even more investors are holding onto Bitcoin for the long term, indicating a continued belief in the asset's potential. This could help to create a more stable market and lead to greater adoption of Bitcoin as a viable investment option.

On the negative side, a high percentage of inactive Bitcoin supply for over three years could suggest that many early adopters of Bitcoin are simply holding onto their coins and not actively using them. This could potentially limit the overall usefulness of Bitcoin as a currency, as there may not be enough circulating supply to support widespread adoption. Additionally, it could potentially lead to increased centralization of the Bitcoin market, as a small number of large holders control a significant portion of the total supply.