Analysts claim that the Ripple lawsuit is a facade for the global financial power play

A researcher in the field of cryptocurrency is drawing attention with a controversial theory: the lawsuit between Ripple and SEC may not simply be a legal conflict, but could be a carefully orchestrated strategy to serve deeper goals.

According to Jesse, the current legal developments are not merely related to regulations but also to control. He argues that this lawsuit creates a smokescreen, holding XRP undervalued, allowing Ripple to quietly establish influential partnerships globally without drawing too much attention from the public or the market. He suspects that the company has close ties with major organizations such as central banks and even the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

What is special about Ripple, according to Jesse, is its ambition to position XRP as a future platform for the global financial system—potentially becoming a reserve currency to challenge existing systems like SWIFT. He compares it to historical figures who attempted to implement monetary reforms but quickly faced resistance. However, he notes that Ripple continues to evolve—this leads him to believe that the company is not opposing the system but may be working alongside it.

According to Jesse, the legal battle with the SEC could serve various purposes: from dampening retail investor enthusiasm to facilitating Ripple in signing confidential agreements. He points out that there are many rumors about undisclosed (NDA) agreements with large organizations, indicating that these partners will benefit from the low XRP price until a potential breakout occurs.

Although his claims are speculative in nature, Jesse asserts that this is the result of many years of research—not a conspiracy, but a theory that he encourages everyone to consider.

Mr. Giáo